Skip to main content

When Actors Are Replaced - Terrence Howard opens up about Iron Man

Terrence Howard opened up about being replaced by Don Cheadle in the Iron Man movies.

He was on Watch What Happens Live and hinted at the reason he was replaced by Cheadle as Lt. Col. James "Rhodey" Rhodes. The reason? Apparently it's Iron Man himself.

Yep. Howard says Robert Downey Jr. is the reason he got booted...more or less.

He told host Andy Cohen: "It turns out that the person I helped become Iron Man ... when it was time to re-up for the second one, (he) took the money that was supposed to go to me and pushed me out."

Iron Man, of course, is Downey.

I guess he and Downey had some kind of falling out.

"We did a three-picture deal, so that means that you did the deal ahead of time," Howard said. "It was going to be a certain amount for the first one, a certain amount for the second one, a certain amount for the third.

They came to me with the second and said, 'Look, we will pay you one-eighth of what we contractually had for you, because we think the second one will be successful with or without you.' And I called my friend — that I helped get the first job — and he didn't call me back for three months."



Apparently Downey wanted more money, so they pulled the money from Howard. I kind of find that hard to believe, but it would have been interesting to hear that phone conversation when Downey did call Howard back three months later.

As for his replacement? Terrence didn't say much about Don Cheadle. Personally, I could have gone either way. Howard didn't rock the world as Rhodey. Cheadle was OK. He didn't steal the show either though.

I suppose Cheadle and Downey do have a better chemistry. Granted, they've had two movies to develop chemistry together, while Howard and Downey had just one.

Personally, I hate it when Hollywood replaces actors and keeps the same role. It doesn't seem to happen as much these days.

Instead of having a new actor fill the same role, TV show and movie decision makers simply create a new character. That's why shows like Two and a Half Men and C.S.I. have lasted so long. Instead of ending when major cast members departed, creators hired new actors to fill new roles.

Although that's kind of a cheap way of keeping the show going, I'd prefer that to having an entirely new actor/actress play the same character. It does happen though.

When Lisa Robin Kelly was booted from That 70's Show, they kept the Laurie Forman character going by hiring Christina Moore.

Christina may be a good actress in her own right, but as Laurie Forman, she was no replacement for Lisa Robin Kelly.

Christina tried, but the character fans enjoyed watching wasn't the same. That's why it's never a good idea to replace a character: you'll often end up with a worse situation than if you wrote the character off completely.

Sometimes it has to be done though.

That was the case in the Dark Knight trilogy. When Katie Holmes decided not to do The Dark Knight after playing Rachel Dawes in Batman Begins, they had to find a replacement.

That replacement came in the form of Maggie Gyllenhaal. She looked close enough to Holmes to make the replacement work. It probably didn't hurt that Gyllenhaal played the role better than Holmes did.

Katie Holmes was fine in Dawson's Creek, but I haven't enjoyed her work in anything since. She was merely okay in Batman Begins. Meanwhile, Gyllenhaal walked into a role someone else started on and completely owned it. Sometimes it does work. When watching the movies back-to-back-to-back it does look a little silly, seeing two different actresses playing the same role.

I guess, at the end of the day, replacing actors doesn't always hurt the trilogy.

Evidently, in Howard's case, it can result in hurt feelings. Maybe rightfully so. I think I would have taken the pay cut and been in the next two movies though.


Related Content:
Murder, She Wrote reboot -- good idea or mistake?
5 Awesome TV Shows You Probably Forgot About
TV’s Most Sustainable Stars
The Hart of Dixie (Season 1) - reviewed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Celebrity (look-a-like) sightings - part 3

Part 1 and Part 2 were good, but I think there's some definite look-a-likes this time around. I'll get right to the comparisons, but let me know what you think? Am I spot on or what? I saved the very best (and closest comparison) for last this time, so make sure to scroll to the bottom of the page. On the left: Edge On the right: Jamie Campbell Bower May as well start with a wrestling-related one. It seems those pro wrestlers have doppelgängers all over. I'd mentioned before that Wilson Bethel resembles Edge . I still stand by that statement. However, I think Jamie Campbell Bower looks even more like Edge. Jamie Bower, for those who are unaware like I was, is an actor who has quite an impressive resume already. I just watched The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones (review to come later) and that's the first time I saw him...or so I thought. Jamie was in the final three Twilight movies, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Parts 1 and 2 , and t...

Choosing a side on DVD menu's -- what's the point?

Most DVDs go to a menu screen after you’re done hearing about ‘the cloud,’ how cigarettes can kill you and seeing a preview for the latest animated film. Some, however, give you an option. ‘Pick a side,’ they say. I’ve run into this twice recently – with the G.I. Joe DVD and The Break-Up DVD . At first I thought it was a cool concept. Maybe, if you pick Cobra’s side, there’s an alternate ending? Or maybe some special features --- like an in-depth look at Storm Shadow’s sword training. If you pick the side of the Joe’s, maybe there’s a look at their stunt training. No, no, and no. I went with Cobra and it takes you to the exact same screen, with the exact same features, as it does when you pick G.I. Joe. Same thing with The Break-Up .

R.I.P. to the Apple Grande

I got some sad news recently: Taco John's discontinued their deliciously underrated treat: the apple grande. For me, this is worse than the Twinkie ordeal earlier this year. I grew up eating these whenever my family went to Taco John's. You didn't even need to get a taco. A Pepsi, potato oles and an apple grande was a delicious meal by itself. The apple grande was not one of those treats that you'd often hear people talking about. There are probably quite a few people out there who never even got to experience the taste bud happiness that the apple grande provided. It was an amazing, crispy flour tortilla that was coated in cinnamon and sugar and topped with warm apple filling, cheddar cheese and crushed cinnamon candy. I was told by one of the Taco John's locations that they no longer served the apple grande and that it was a nationwide change. I don't know if that's the case or not. The item is still listed on the Taco John's website...